Fit By February

... a fitspo journey

  • 27th May
    2012
  • 27

The new mocha cookie crumble frappuccino does not taste good at all.

risaellen:

inspiremethin:

iwill-sail:

inspiremethin:

What a waste of 330 calories.

not to mention its the most complicated drink to make.

dont cave in to social pressure by buying this drink O_o

Yeah, I don’t doubt it. The barista was mixing like a bajillion things into it. But I saw it was new on the menu and was curious. She explained it was like a mocha frapp (which I tried once and it wasn’t horrible, with java chips, chocolate whipped cream, and oreo crumbles). It SOUNDED pretty okay. In my head I thought it would be like a java chip frapp with extra mochaness and oreo goodness on top. NOPE. Personally, I hated the chocolate whipped creme. It tastes so fake. And just >.< The frapp would have been a bajillion times better with the regular whipped cream. Andddd it tasted more sugary/chocolatey than it did mocha-java-chippy. And I didn’t like that either. I prefer my frapps more coffee tasting. And this was definitely not my cup of tea. Oh well. At least I know I won’t be curious for it anymore. My usual is french vanilla coffee frapp with half less syrup sweetener. 

Now I have a weird aftertaste. Bleh. I’m going to run this off later today.

People have been asking for a cookies and cream frappe for ages, and this derivative did not deliver. Even the chocolate whipped cream is nasty. Nothing about it is pleasant.

Don’t they already have a cookies & creme frap? It might be on the secret menu or something, but the Starbucks where I work has them as samples a lot, and once I had them make me a larger version. 

It’s incredibly unhealthy (made with Half & Half) so I suggest subbing skim or soy milk. 

  • 17th May
    2012
  • 17
  • 16th May
    2012
  • 16
muffintop-less:

I often hear about people not counting fruits and vegetables into their daily intake and then complaining about not losing weight. It’s important to remember that just because a food is healthy, does not mean it doesn’t have calories. Fruits, vegetables, nuts, meat, beans and other clean, healthy foods still contain calories. Remember, calories are units of ENERGY. They give our body FUEL to function properly. Our internal organs even use them to function. So it is crucial to ingest them…. however if you are counting calories, these foods should all still be counted. =)

THIS.
I&#8217;ve noticed a trend on Tumblr of: &#8220;Look at all these fruits and veggies. I love them and can eat as many as I want.&#8221; 
If you&#8217;re trying to lose weight, that&#8217;s not the case. Both are super healthy for you but weight loss is about moderation of all food. 
And while I&#8217;ve got you here - not everyone can eat as much fruit as they want. Yes, they have natural sugars, but a diabetic, for example, has to watch their carb count and eating a ton of fruit would spike their blood sugar. That doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re going overboard with their restricting - they&#8217;re doing it for their own safety. 

muffintop-less:

I often hear about people not counting fruits and vegetables into their daily intake and then complaining about not losing weight. It’s important to remember that just because a food is healthy, does not mean it doesn’t have calories. Fruits, vegetables, nuts, meat, beans and other clean, healthy foods still contain calories. Remember, calories are units of ENERGY. They give our body FUEL to function properly. Our internal organs even use them to function. So it is crucial to ingest them…. however if you are counting calories, these foods should all still be counted. =)

THIS.

I’ve noticed a trend on Tumblr of: “Look at all these fruits and veggies. I love them and can eat as many as I want.” 

If you’re trying to lose weight, that’s not the case. Both are super healthy for you but weight loss is about moderation of all food

And while I’ve got you here - not everyone can eat as much fruit as they want. Yes, they have natural sugars, but a diabetic, for example, has to watch their carb count and eating a ton of fruit would spike their blood sugar. That doesn’t mean they’re going overboard with their restricting - they’re doing it for their own safety. 

  • 14th May
    2012
  • 14
  • 13th May
    2012
  • 13

FRAPPUCCINO HAPPY HOUR

wellthatblowes:

Frappuccino Happy Hour at Starbucks seemed like a great deal, right? Unless, like me, you are dieting. For the last 10 days I continued to spend over $4 on my venti skinny latte while the HALF-OFF FRAPPUCHINOS sign stared me in the face. I did not give in, though, and took matters into my own hands.

I present to you, the DIET-FRIENDLY MOCHA COCONUT FRAPPUCCINO!

Ingredients:

1/2 cup skim milk

1 packet Starbucks Via (or other instant coffee)

2 packets Truvia or your favorite zero-calorie sweetner

1 tbsp cocoa powder

1 tbsp unsweetened coconut flakes

5-10 ice cubes, depending on desired thickness

Combine above ingredients into blender, blend until smooth. Makes a 16oz (Grande) frozen beverage.

Top with Reddi Wip fat-free whipped cream, drizzle with chocolate syrup, sprinkle with coconut flakes.

NUTRITION INFORMATION

CALORIES: 103

CARBS: 19g

FIBER: 3g

FAT: 3g

PROTEIN: 4g

WEIGHT WATCHERS POINTS-PLUS VALUE: 3

How does this measure up to the Starbucks version? I’ll just leave this here.

  • 12th May
    2012
  • 12
  • 5th May
    2012
  • 05

2009 vs 2012, sister edition. 

Today is Emma’s prom. She’s lost her baby fat, and I’ve lost, well, fat. 

  • 4th May
    2012
  • 04

So I took the time to actually read and study C25K.

losingmeaway:

And I died a little inside.

I CANNOT SEE ME RUNNING 20 MINUTES NON STOP.

How will I even do this

I’ve done the C25K program twice through (two summers in a row, where I neglected to run in the winter) and I promise you, it is possible. 

I actually remember my very first 20 minute run, in the summer of 2010. I was terrified - I had never run so long in my life. But it was so amazing. It was the first time I ever got a runner’s high from the endorphins. 

You will love it. I promise. 

(Source: fitnessisyourfavoritepassion)

  • 4th May
    2012
  • 04

kentuckyfriedbones:

Eyy, guess who’s starting to lose weight the healthy way? (Answer: Me.)

I’m pretty new to fitblrs/fitspo blogs, so it would mean a lot if you would like or reblog this if you’re a healthy fitspo blog! I’ll follow you all! Promise promise promise!

You can also recommend some good ones for me to follow? :)

(via futurehealthfreak)

  • 1st May
    2012
  • 01
girlgrowingsmall:

mrshowardhughes:

veganlove:

hello friends,it came to my attention yesterday, when I was informed by two people I hold in high regard, that this photo portrayal of meat vs beans is completely wrong. I found it on Veganism Worldwides facebook page, so I *assumed* it was true. How ignorant of me.If any of you can provide sources that prove what the above picture is saying, I would love to see them, but my friend already researched the internet high and low and the best she could come up with is 15 g per 4 oz black beans.The reason I am putting this out there, is because things like this, that are blatant lies, hurt veganism as a whole. People become very doubtful and suspicious when they are fed lies, no matter what side it is from. I just want you all to know this, because I was quite embarrassed when I was confronted about it. 

24g of protein is nearly half the average daily recommendation, so if a measly 4 oz of beans were to provide that…that’s kinda scary. Also, beef is not that acidic — it creates more acidity in the body due to the digestive process, those are two different things. TL;DR, don’t trust nutrition graphics for shit.

Furthermore, beans are higher in carbohydrates, making them dangerous for carb-sensitive folks like me. Much respect for the vegans trying to fact correct this.

24g of protein for 4oz of black beans? Someone please find me these magic, non-existant beans. 

girlgrowingsmall:

mrshowardhughes:

veganlove:

hello friends,
it came to my attention yesterday, when I was informed by two people I hold in high regard, that this photo portrayal of meat vs beans is completely wrong. I found it on Veganism Worldwides facebook page, so I *assumed* it was true. How ignorant of me.

If any of you can provide sources that prove what the above picture is saying, I would love to see them, but my friend already researched the internet high and low and the best she could come up with is 15 g per 4 oz black beans.

The reason I am putting this out there, is because things like this, that are blatant lies, hurt veganism as a whole. People become very doubtful and suspicious when they are fed lies, no matter what side it is from. I just want you all to know this, because I was quite embarrassed when I was confronted about it. 

24g of protein is nearly half the average daily recommendation, so if a measly 4 oz of beans were to provide that…that’s kinda scary. Also, beef is not that acidic — it creates more acidity in the body due to the digestive process, those are two different things. TL;DR, don’t trust nutrition graphics for shit.

Furthermore, beans are higher in carbohydrates, making them dangerous for carb-sensitive folks like me. Much respect for the vegans trying to fact correct this.

24g of protein for 4oz of black beans? Someone please find me these magic, non-existant beans.